Skip to main content

Libertarianism

 

Murray Rothbard, attributed to the Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Libertarianism is a political philosophy that emphasizes individual liberty as its key principle. It advocates for a minimal state presence in the lives of individuals, arguing that people should be free to live as they choose, provided they do not infringe on the rights of others. The core ideas of libertarianism revolve around the concepts of personal freedom, economic freedom, and a skepticism of authority, especially governmental authority. Here is a detailed summary of its main tenets, variations, and criticisms:

Core Tenets:

  1. Individual Liberty: Libertarianism places the highest value on individual freedom, believing that individuals have the right to make choices for themselves in all aspects of their lives. This includes freedom of speech, religion, association, and the right to privacy.
  2. Limited Government: Libertarians advocate for a government that is limited in scope and powers, focusing primarily on protecting individuals from coercion and violence. They argue that many functions currently performed by the government can be better handled by private individuals or organizations.
  3. Free Market Economy: A key component of libertarian thought is the belief in a free-market economy, where transactions are made without government interference. Libertarians argue that economic freedom is an essential part of individual liberty and that free markets lead to more efficient outcomes than those regulated by governments.
  4. Rule of Law: Libertarians stress the importance of the rule of law, where laws are clear, public, and apply equally to everyone, including government officials. They oppose arbitrary use of power and support property rights and contracts enforcement.
  5. Self-Ownership: The principle of self-ownership is central to libertarianism. It posits that individuals own their bodies and the fruits of their labor and should be free to engage in voluntary exchanges.
  6. Non-Aggression Principle: The strongly rooted belief in individual liberty naturally extends to others. One person cannot force or, rather, coerce another person to pay or believe what that other person may deem to be perverse or unnatural to themselves; they must voluntarily agree. The simplest example of this is an income tax: no people have an inherent right to take property (income) from another.
  7. Non-intervention: The non-aggression principle extended into foreign policy. No one country or group of people have any right to intervene into another country's or group's affairs without payment and contractual agreement. Prime examples of this would be the Irag War, the Ukraine/Russian War, the Israeli/Palestinian War.

Influential Persons

  1. Ludwig von Mises - known to be the father of Austrian Economics and a brilliant sociologist.
  2. Murray Rothbard - A strong and eloquent proponent of libertarianism.
  3. Thomas E. Woods - Possibly the greatest modern proponent of libertarianism.

Variations of Libertarianism:

  • Anarcho-Capitalism: Advocates for the elimination of the state altogether and the provision of all services through the free market.
  • Classical Liberalism: Emphasizes individual freedoms and democratic institutions but allows for a more significant government role in providing public goods and a social safety net. Think John Locke.
  • Minarchism: Argues for a "night-watchman state" limited to protecting individuals from aggression, theft, breach of contract, and fraud.
  • Libertarian Socialism, which is a contradiction, at first glance, but there are enough people involved with this view that it should be covered: Focuses on decentralization and voluntary association but differs from other forms by advocating for communal or cooperative ownership of production rather than individual property rights.

Criticisms:

  • Social Welfare: Critics argue that libertarianism does not adequately address how to support those who are disadvantaged, suggesting that the minimal state model could lead to significant inequalities and social injustice.
  • Public Goods and Externalities: Skeptics point out that a free market might fail to produce certain essential public goods (like roads, lighthouses, and national defense) and may not properly address externalities (costs or benefits not reflected in market prices, such as pollution).
  • Feasibility and Implementation: There are concerns about the practicality of transitioning to a libertarian society, especially in terms of regulatory functions and the maintenance of law and order, without a central governing authority.

Libertarianism remains a vibrant and evolving political ideology, with ongoing debates both within the movement and with its critics. Its influence can be seen in various political movements worldwide, emphasizing its enduring appeal to those who champion individual freedom and skeptical views on government power.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Quick Hits #2

Trump Wins New Hampshire.      Donald Trump easily takes New Hampshire from Nikki Haley, although the race was much closer than Iowa. While this gives Trump great advantage, South Carolina may be a closer race than one thinks. Trump has recently been ordered to pay $83 million to E. Jean Carroll in a defamation suit. Wither we believe the charges and such against Trump are true or false, the hits keep coming. At what point will the "straw that breaks the camels back" fall? At what point do we realize that Trump cannot win the general election? Will it be after a November loss? Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is polling at  20% in some political areas. We need to understand that Kennedy is a Democrat who believes that the DNC, and the "woke" citizens, have lost their minds. Even running as an Independent, Kennedy could win. He will pull votes from Trump and many from Biden. He needs to be taken seriously and the GOP needs to take a long hard look, before the South Carolina pr

Where Do We Start?

George Washington, Prayer at Valley Forge, National Archives,  Engraving by John McRae from painting by Henry Brueckner      Its been a while since I have posted, as I was at a loss for words. The following are some introductory thoughts on where we are wrong and how we can begin to get back to being who the pioneers of this country intended us to be.       It was God's design for man to be free. When I say free, I mean without earthly overlord. From the beginning, Abraham followed the law of the land but only faithful to God. As a matter of fact, so much was his great faith that the Hebrew writer states several times in chapter 11, "...by faith Abraham". Yes, it is my intention to directly tie faithfulness to God with freedom. That specific thought will be developed in later posts, but for now we see that Abraham really had no king but God.      The Israelites had no king when they left Egypt. Yes, they had Moses, but Moses took his direction straight from God. The Israe