Skip to main content

Democrat or Republican?

Image
By

Patrick Henry in the House of Burgesses, National Archives, Engraving from painting by PH. Rothermel

Of note, it appears that a descendant of mine may have been in the House of Burgess, Francis Gabriel Holland

     Assigning ourselves to a particular philosophy can be tricky. Are you a Democrat or a Republican? To answer that, we probably need to be more descriptive. Let us ask the question differently, are you conservative, liberal, or somewhere in between? Hopefully, this post will help define such terms so that you can more specifically define your beliefs or better stated, philosophy or ideology.

     Liberalism, as defined by Oxford, is a "willingness to respect or accept behavior or opinions different from one's own; openness to new ideas." In addition, Oxford says, "the holding of political views that are socially progressive and promote social welfare." Ah, there's that word, progressive. I am under the opinion that classical (of yester year) liberalism fits the first definition listed. Neo (New) liberalism is the second definition. By the true sense of the word, classically, liberal foreign policy views were anti-war. Today, it appears that liberals haven't seen a war they didn't like. Over time, liberalism has become adamantly progressive, almost militant in nature - at least those of the far-left. Communism and Socialism are terms commonly used, accurately, with progressivism.  If you do not spend your time watching ABC, NBC, MSNBC, or CNN then you know where I am coming from. Freedom to assemble does not mean freedom to be violent or destructive. 

     Conservatism, as defined by Oxford, is a "commitment to traditional values and ideas with opposition to change or innovation." In addition, Oxford says, "the holding of political views that favor free enterprise, private ownership, and socially traditional ideas." With conservatism, as with liberalism, there is classical (think Edmund Burke) and neo (think Mitt Romney or John McCain). Classical conservatives held tight to tradition of all types, only changing when it is proved that society will truly benefit. Neo-conservatives seem to only hold to traditions that may only benefit them. Stop watching Fox News, by the way. There is the far-right, which, as a group, is not nearly as violent or destructive as the main stream make them out to be. Still, there is no right to be violent or destructive. 

     So, where does that leave Democrats and Republicans? This is an interesting question. I propose that most that consider themselves one or the other does not hold the hard left or right view point.  The far-left and the far-right are really not representative of the mainline parties. The term "The squeaky wheel gets the grease!" comes to mind and I implore you and us all to remember that if mainline media is trying to convince us to hate or deplore another group of people, they have an agenda and in the real world, each of us are not as hardline as they would have us believe. Watching the newest Biden campaign commercial made my blood crawl and I am not a fan of Trump. I know many Trump supporters that are peaceful, hard working, committed, and are strong supporters of community and posterity. Guess what? I can say the same for Biden supporters.  The vast majority of Trump supporters are not far-right. Those that hold their breath when they vote Biden are not far-left. 

     Let us throw another one in here: libertarianism. It is my view that most libertarians are a mixture of the classical liberal and conservative philosophy. I consider myself as a conservative libertarian. I don't believe we can completely remove regulation, but that regulation has basically become a prop for corporate success, politicians creating laws for their buddies and their pockets. It stifles growth and innovation.  I don't think all street drugs should be legal. War? Only in what can clearly be defined as an immediate and imminent threat to American life and then use Augustine's Just War Theory with an official declaration of war from Congress.

     I'll shift gears here for a moment, if you'll allow, and I haven't lost you yet. Do you believe that health care coverage (insurance) is a right? Neo-democratic view. Do you believe that the markets do not need as much regulation as they have? Neo-republican. Do you believe that health insurance is not a right and that we need far, far less regulation - if not the entire elimination of some, of the markets? Libertarian view. Women have the right to an abortion? Neo-democratic view. Strong military, policing the world? It appears that both Neo-democratic and republican views prevail here. Enough military to defend ourselves and holding to non-intervention ideas? Libertarian view.

     What we see, from both sides of the aisle, is an increasing militant approach to force someone into agreeing with whatever view is held, by the majority. Majority rule can quickly turn to mob rule, please remember that. Of all the news I've watched, I've never heard someone define these political philosophies. We will discuss what best political philosophy we should have in a later post. :) 

     As Benjamin Franklin once said, and I paraphrase, "Democracy is four wolves looking at a lamb deciding what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."

May God Bless You and Your Family.

Recommended Reading:

Yes, I am an affiliate. There will be a pop-up window asking if you wish to redirect. Thank you!

Conservative?

Liberal?

Libertarian?

Like to travel? Washington DC

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Progressivism

By
Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, Library of Congress Yes, Ol' Teddy and Woodrow were progressives. Progressivism is a political and social ideology that advocates for reform and improvement of society through governmental action, most accurately, government force . Progressives seek to address the underlying causes of social issues and support modernization, scientific and technological improvements, and changes in the political system to better represent the people’s interests. Check my link page! Core Principles: Social Progress : The belief in the ability and duty to improve society and the lives of its citizens, often through coercive reform. Equality : Progressives aim to reduce economic, racial, and gender disparities through targeted reforms. Equality in outcome rather than equality in possibility. Democracy : Enthusiastic support for making the political process more transparent and increasing public participation in government. This is often communicated as ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Conservatism

By
Edmund Burke, Portrait  c.  1769 Conservatism is a political and social philosophy that promotes the maintenance of traditional institutions and supports minimal and gradual change in society over time. Check my link page! Core Principles: Conservatism as a philosophy is centered around several core principles: Tradition : Conservatives value the customs, conventions, and continuity of societal organizations as a guide for the present and future. Tradition is seen as a cumulative wisdom of the past that should be honored and preserved. Order and Stability : A stable social order is deemed essential for the well-being of society. Conservatives often emphasize the need for a hierarchical structure and clear authority lines to maintain stability. Individual Responsibility : Personal responsibility and self-reliance are emphasized. Conservatives believe that individuals should take responsibility for their actions and welfare rather than relying on government assistance. Rule of Law : ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Afghanistan

By
 Foreign policy and geopolitics can be a messy business. It is more messy the more one injects ones nose into someone else's business.  Nation building; more bluntly, empire expansion is costly, and often will fail unless the conquered culture truly accepts its conquered state. Afghanistan is a recent example of this. Trillions of American dollars have been spent on creating and nurturing a democracy. Conspiracy theorist ideas aside, what has happened there is an embarrassment. The majority of Americans, I believe, do feel as though we couldn't be there forever. Pulling out of the country should have been the goal all along, and one should strongly reflect on future occupations of foreign soils after this debacle. I have stated before that we should have never occupied Afghanistan at any point. Leaving is a good idea; how we leave matters. For some reason (maybe nuclear) we, as a country, love Pakistan and there are credible sources who say that most of the problems there are ...
1 comment
Read more